Home Up Search

Up Purchase Gas Saver Training Purchase TIP of the MONTH How GSS Works Flow Rate Limiter Sales Literature Video Overview About Company Weld Safely PRODUCT INDEX Production Results Orifice Flow Control Lean Manufacturing Weld School Payback Estimates Go Green Other Weld Info More GSS Info Services Overview Car Buffs Specials Contact Us Site Index

 

Explanation for Variations in Charpy Impact Test Results

Fabricators often see significant differences in  Charpy impact properties when making  procedure tests.  This occurs even with the same welding materials, plate and welding parameters.  We encountered this situation a number of years ago when exploring significant impact property differences in multipass welds with process procedure variations that should not have produced these differences. 

 

When we observed significant impact property variations where none should have existed, we discussed this situation with Dr. Robert Stout from Lehigh University who was a consultant to our Welding R&D Laboratory.  We employed his suggestion of comparing the impact results with the percent refined versus unrefined weld metal in each Charpy specimen.  This approach mostly explained the differences at the higher test temperature.  But the procedure could not account for the difference of 44 ft-lbs to 8 ft-lbs found in the -50 degree F tests.

Our Senior Metallurgist, Dr. E. C. (Ted) Nelson, postulated a possible reason for these differences after examining the specimens.  He requested we make a large multipass weldment so he could place Charpy specimens avoiding any issues of plate dilution.  Dr. Nelson carefully located Charpy specimens in this weld and  was able to duplicate the  impact property range we had encountered.  One Charpy producing  7 and another 45 ft-lbs in the exact same weld metal! This web page presents a summary of the findings.

Below is a "picture summary" of what  was found.  The  schematics of Charpy impact specimens were all prepared from one weld.  Dr. Nelson placed the Charpy specimens to locate the "V" notch such that there was about 50% refined material in all specimens.  However some had single refined material, some double refined areas (those shown in yellow) and most important the refined material was placed at the outer edges for the specimens. 

Doubly refined material placed at the specimen edges produced  the highest toughness values!  Still maintaining about 50% refined material in the location of the Charpy "V" he placed single refined material in the center of the specimen, the least effective location and only 7 ft-lbs were achieved!

Want to know the theory behind the differences?  A Free 7 Page Report is available as a PDF download.  It also shows graphs of the toughness values versus refined and unrefined material from our original work.  This original data indicates why this further study was conducted with Dr. Nelson. 

Click for a Copy    

Purchase Gas Saving Products

 

Purchase Training Aids

 

Purchase Flow Rate Limiter

 

Purchase Wire Feeding Aids

 

 

Purchase Replaceable Orifice Flow Control System

Save over $1000 per year per welder and improve weld starts with Payback measured in weeks!!
* US Patent  # 6,610,957;  "Welding Shielding Gas Saver Device" August 26, 2003;  Canadian Patent # 2,455,644.  
 The "Flow Rate Limiter" device is covered by 2008 US patent # 7,462,709.  Other site material may be covered under Patents # 7,015,412; # 7,019,248 or # 8,104,094
Questions?   Send E-mail TechSupport@NetWelding.com    Or See Contact Us
Last modified: 03/23/13

Copyright 1999-2012 WA Technology TM; GSS TM;  All rights reserved.