
Improving Quality of MIG Welds
and Weld Starts
|
|
EXCESS
GAS FLOW RATE:
At Each Weld Start a blast of shielding gas
exits the torch nozzle at very high flow rates with typical gas delivery systems. We have measured peak
flow surge rates exceeding 200 CFH. (Click
Graph for details of measurements made in this production application)
This is well above the flow rate that
creates turbulence in the shielding gas stream. This turbulence pulls
moisture laden air
into the gas stream creating poor shielding. The turbulence takes a short
time to stabilize even after the flow returns to the preset level.
This creates excess spatter and often internal weld porosity. The ideal
starting gas flow control is shown by the graph labeled
GSS. This limits excess gas surge while still
providing extra gas needed to purge the torch nozzle and weld start area.
Also Welders
Often Set excess shielding gas flow rates believing "if some is good more must be
better." Just how much gas flow is excess? A recent
article published in Practical
Welding Today by Kevin Lyttle, Manager
Welding R&D for Praxair states; “In
many instances production site surveys determine that
shielding gas flow rates typically are set in excess of 50 CFH. This can
contribute to poor weld quality as atmospheric gases are drawn into the arc zone
because of excess gas turbulence. Optimized flow enhances quality and
reduces shielding gas usage.”
Other
technical articles confirm this 50 CFH maximum level for a 5/8 inch ID torch nozzle
size which is typically used for industrial welding.
|
|
NITROGEN POROSITY:
With solid steel MIG wires,
some Oxygen can be tolerated. The silicon and manganese contained in the
wire can combine with the Oxygen to form silicon and manganese oxide
and avoid the carbon in the weld puddle forming a CO bubble. These oxides
float to the weld surface. However
published information indicates Nitrogen at levels less than 2% in the shielding
gas can cause porosity in single pass welds (Reference ESAB, former L-TEC/
Linde MIG Welding Handbook; ".. 2% Nitrogen produced porosity in single pass
welds made in mild steel; additions of 0.5% produced porosity in multipass welds." )
Unlike Oxygen, chemically combining Nitrogen into harmless compounds is not
viable with solid wire. Elements like titanium can be employed but only at low
levels since significant amounts cause embitterment.
|
|
Weld Tests by Ludwig Quantify Nitrogen Problems:
Visible evidence of the effect of nitrogen was
reported by Ludwig in a Welding Journal Technical Paper (September 1955.)
Typical of the quality research work done at the time, he employed a
shielding chamber so the effects of turbulence in the shielding stream were eliminated as a
variable. The following are some photographs of the more than 35 steel welds he
made in an atmosphere of Argon with various amounts of Nitrogen added: |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
Ludwig concludes in this 6 page
research report: "no more than 1% Nitrogen should be allowed but
preferably 0.5% ...it may be introduced from the atmosphere in proximity of
the Argon shield." |
|
Remember Air contains 78% Nitrogen; 5%
contamination in the shielding gas stream due to turbulence gives 3.9%
Nitrogen in the gas stream. That is sufficient to produce at least
internal porosity. Be sure your getting what you pay for
-
SEE ARGON PURITY BELOW.
|
INSUFFICIENT
EXTRA GAS AT THE WELD START ALSO A POOR SHIELDING PROBLEM:
Excess gas flow rate at the weld start is
bad but insufficient extra gas creates
similar problems. This was stated
best by Stauffer's 1982 patent.
He clearly understood
the problem and designed around it using a "surge storage tank"; he states
in the patent teaching,
"... air leaks back into the torch and lines when
welding is stopped. The air must be quickly purged and replaced with inert
gas to produce high quality welds.
Also, it is
critical to displace the air at the weld zone of the work piece upon initiating
the weld.
"
Some devices that
attempt to reduce gas surge create a weld start problem. These devices
set gas flow at the wire feeder such as simple orifices, regulators,
flowmeters or needle valves. Welders often observe this lack of start
gas needed to purge the air from the start area. They try to counter
by increasing the steady state gas flow rate to achieve more gas at the weld start!
But increasing the steady state flow still does not sufficiently purge the weld
start area and just increases needed flow while welding, wasting gas!
CLICK for More Information About Needing Extra Gas at the Weld Start?
|
|
PRODUCTION EXAMPLES OF PROBLEMS
CREATED WITH SOME DEVICES THAT CONTROL FLOW AT THE FEEDER:
Case 1: Low Pressure Gas
Control Device Mounted at Wire Feeder Caused Weld Quality Problems
A
Welding Engineer at a major Midwest heavy construction equipment company
was having porosity in the same weldment in one plant and not in another.
He performed a very careful, systematic analysis of the problem.
A fishbone troubleshooting diagram was developed with over 30 items
considered in attempt to solve the problem. It appeared to be a
nitrogen porosity problem so he looked at all the possible causes. He checked for
pipeline, solenoid, feeder plumbing leaks, putting on cylinder gas supply to validate the quality of
shielding gas and many others items. He even tried a different type and
manufacturer of the solid wire they were using.
After all this testing and
elimination of differences he found one of the ma jor
causes was the plant
with the porosity problem was using low pressure surge reducing
devices on their wire feeders (photo right.) These controlled flow at the
feeder providing insufficient extra gas to purge the torch nozzle and weld
start area of moisture laden air. These were removed and the
problems went away!
This particular regulator
flow control device used low pressure to control flow. This creates a
double problem! In our tests of this device we found only 9 psi was
needed to flow 31 CFH. With the range of flow restrictions found in
production
flows varied from 16 to 37 CFH while the flow calibrated pressure gauge
read a steady 31 CFH (CLICK
FOR TEST RESULTS.) In addition to the lack of sufficient start gas;
variability in flow was probably allowing
nitrogen to enter the shielding gas stream even when welding. If shielding gas flow rate
is too high or too low this can occur.
BE CAREFUL SOME OF THESE
DEVICES SOLD TO REDUCE SURGE DO NOT MENTION THAT THEY USE LOW PRESSURE TO
CONTROL FLOW ! ALSO ANY DEVICE THAT
MOUNTS DIRECTLY AT THE FEEDER WILL NOT PROVIDE SUFFICIENT EXTRA START GAS.
EMAIL IF YOU HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT A SPECIFIC MODEL.
See more production
examples of problems encountered with low pressure devices and orifices
placed at the wire feeder to control flow. There is also an
explanation of why the developers of MIG and TIG understood the need for
"Automatic Flow Compensation" which some have forgotten!
|
|
Case 2: Removing Orifice Mounted at Feeder Showed
Benefits of Having a Limited Amount of Extra Gas at a Controlled Flow Rate at Weld Start:
If sufficient shielding gas is not
provided at the start, welders may try to compensate by using higher overall
gas flow. A bar joist manufacturer was using flow control orifices
mounted at the wire feeders. Argon/CO2 shielding gas is supplied in a pipeline
through about 15 feet of gas
delivery hose. The flow control orifice
established the flow at 45 CFH. However the welders wanted higher flow
rates with some even drilling out the orifice! The welding engineer wanted to avoid wasting
shielding gas. With this flow setting arrangement where control is mounted at
the feeder there is insufficient extra gas provided at the weld start.
This lack of extra gas prevents to purging the weld start area of
moisture laden air.

A test was made to check weld performance and potential shielding gas
savings using two cylinders of gas on two adjacent welders instead
of their pipeline gas supply. One was set with their
standard flow control orifice system and a regulator providing a pressure
that matched their pipeline, 50 psi. The other with a
regulator/flowmeter (also of a 50 psi design) using a 15 foot
GSS without their flow control
orifice. Both steady state flows were set at 45 CFH. Since welders stand side
by side, it was easy to observe the weld start quality! Instantly the
welder using the
GSS noticed improved
starting. After about an hour with observably better results the
welding engineer suggested we lower the shielding
gas flow on the welder with the
GSS to 35 CFH! The same improved weld start quality
was observed and the welder was "happy." In
fact even though we lowered the steady-state flow to 35 CFH there was still
about the same controlled amount of extra gas available at the start (that
stored in the GSS
hose when welding stopped.) The higher start gas flow rate established by the
surge flow orifice in the
GSS maintained
the higher flow at the start.
This higher start flow rate quickly flooded and purged the weld start area of
moisture laden air.
It was this air that was casing
excess spatter and lack of shielding on all their other welders! After about 4 hours of observation it was obvious the spatter
at the weld start was less with the GSS.
We also measured a reduced use of shielding gas of 25%.
After several months of testing to check this one system during windy days etc,
this shop now has
GSS's installed on all 50 welders!
Bottom Line - - "Some extra
gas flow at the start is very beneficial." In addition, after about a year
of use their gas supplier called to see if their business had turned down since
they were using about 30% less gas- it had not!
Also note that any flow control device installed right at the feeder, be
it an orifice flow control or a flowmeter will have the same lack of
sufficient initial shielding gas to purge the weld start area.
One of the major welding companies has been utilizing an oscilloscope and
has documented the "Improved Arc Characteristics" at the weld start when
using one of our Patented Gas Saving Systems.
Note: Don't confuse our Patented Gas Saver System (GSS)
with other devices you may have tried in the past. The GSS provides a controlled amount of extra gas at the weld start
at a flow rate that avoids excess turbulence to properly
purge air. It also does
not alter system pressure so "Automatic Flow Compensation" is maintained. Welders
Love The Results!
SEE DETAILS
|
|
Hydrogen Also A Problem:
Eliminating Oxygen and Nitrogen at the weld start to reduce the possibility to weld
porosity and excess weld spatter requires good shielding. In addition to
Oxygen and Nitrogen the surrounding air contains Moisture or Water Vapor.
The Water Vapor can also be drawn into the arc where it will disassociate into
Oxygen and Hydrogen. Hydrogen can cause more than porosity problems.
Some amount can dissolve in the molten steel and will only come out when the
weld cools. Since they are very small, Hydrogen atoms it can migrate
through the steel accumulating near defects, dislocations, etc. forming Hydrogen
gas. This can cause cracking. These cracks may be in the weld itself
or in the adjacent parent metal called the heat affected zone.
|

When on
pipeline gas supply are corrections made for flow variations due to pressure
changes?
They should be; see Details of Tests. |
|
Argon Purity
Argon is
0.9% of air. It is generally produced by liquefying air and separating the Argon
in a elaborate, expensive distillation column. However Argon can
be produced at lower cost and quality levels and is referred to as "Crude Argon."
Crude Argon may contain about 2% Oxygen. For most steel welding applications
that may not present problems. However "Crude
Argon" contains Nitrogen perhaps about 0.5% ! That is a problem. Even if the
Nitrogen percentage is lower, when combined with moderately turbulent
shielding Nitrogen porosity can result.
The American Welding Society produces a
"Specification For Welding Shielding Gases; AWS A5.32." It defines the
Minimum Purity of Gases to be labeled as meeting the AWS standard. It
can be obtained at
www.awspubs.com That specification defines the
Minimum Purity for Argon as 99.997%. That would allow no more than
0.003% Nitrogen if no Oxygen or other gases were present. It also defines the Maximum
Moisture at 10.5 ppm (= 0.00105%.) There is no reason to get
less- that's what you pa ying
for! Ask for a Certified analysis.
WARNING
The AWS Document also warns that Argon and Carbon Dioxide are heavier than
air and may concentrate in low areas such as the bottom of pressure vessels,
tanks, pits and ships. This can
result in asphyxiation and death. See our page on
"Weld Safely"
|
|
Having
Variations in Chary Impact Test Results?
We did also. We found out why
the same weldment achieved 45 ft-lbs and 7 ft-lbs in the same deposit!
Want to know why?
Check Out
This Web Page |
|
Saving Shielding Gas and Improving Weld Start Quality is Easy...
"Just Replace Existing Gas Delivery Hose with Our
Gas Saver System"
 |

Want to Limit the Maximum Flow Rates That Can
be Set?
Check out our newly patented
Flow Rate Limiter and Lock. It allows the maximum allowable gas
flow to set and locked. It fits most Flowmeters and
regulator/flowmeters without alterations. |
Set Flow With Orifice at Pipeline Gas SupplyOur unique
Replaceable Orifice Insert System
allows you to select from 10 different size "Orifices" to fit you
application and pipeline pressure. |

Hear a Message from the President of WA Technology (Who was
also the 2007 President of the 53,000 Member American Welding Society)
Click to Hear |
|
Want a way to control the maximum shielding gas flow that can be used?
SEE
"Lean Welding Manufacturing" Learning Program
Optimizing Shielding Gas
Use and Eliminating Waste
|
Purchase Gas Saving Products |

Purchase Training Aids |

Purchase
Flow Rate Limiter |

Purchase Wire Feeding
Aids |
|
▲ HOME |

Purchase Replaceable Orifice Flow Control
System |