HISTORY OF SUBMERGED ARC WELDING
continued-- Page 2
JONES, KENNEDY, ROTERMUND PATENT
The key patent that defines the Submerged Arc process is US
Patent number 2,043,960 by Jones, Kennedy and Rothermund. This patent was
assigned to Linde Division of UCC and filed in October 1935. The
Specification states, Page 4, Column 2, Lines 4 through 7 that the application
was in part a continuation of applications Serial Numbers 657,836 and 705,893
filed in February 1933 and January 1934.
There
are no other patents sited against or referenced in US Patent 2,043,960,
indicating this basic process and flux patent did not need to refer to that by
Robinoff. The Specification further discusses what is no doubt the Robinoff
“process” namely on Page 1, Column 2, Lines 23 through 59 parts of which are
quoted: “There is another known means of applying protective flux. It
consists in utilizing thick coating of finely divided material, a flux, which
covers the weld seam. The following is a typical analysis of such a flux…4.34%
Fe2O3…3% Fe. … Moreover the vigor of the arc submerged
under this flux projects a continuous cloud of material into the atmosphere. An
evidence of the amount of gas that is emitted by a flux…welders frequently wear
gas masks…it is not surprising gas holes should be found in the metal of the
weld.”
Quoting the main uniqueness of the process in the
Specification, Page 2, Column 1, Lines 20 through 37; “We have discovered a
novel process for electric welding wherein the necessary heat is generally by
the passage of a heavy electric current between the metal electrode (usually
bare) and the... objects to be welded…the current being carried across the gap
between the electrode and the objects by and through a conductive melt or
welding composition having appropriate electrical resistive properties. … The
welding composition serves as an active instrumentality, or welding media
inasmuch as it provides heating means, controls the rate of penetration and
quality of welding, purifies the molten metal and protects the molten metal.”
They also define a need for prefusing the flux
ingredients in the Specification, Page 2 Column 1, Lines 42 to 45; “The
chemical reactions between the components of the welding composition must be
completed before it is used in welding. Failure in this regard most surely
invites porosity.”
The patent further defines at least 4 compositions for
fluxes including a preferred method of manufacture.
One questionable fact however is their insistence that the process had no arc. In the Specification they even state a situation which
in their minds proved the point. Quoting Page 4, Column 1, Lines 42 to 53;
“Several circumstances show clearly that our process does not depend on the
formation of an arc of the usual type. If, while the weld is being made, the circuit
is opened externally of the weld and then closed again while the reactive
composition is still molten the current will immediately resume its flow without
any necessarily for moving the electrode into contact with the seam as it would
be necessary to reestablish the arc of the usual type. The heat for melting the
electrode is evidently developed in the conductive melt it self.”
See Side Bar