WATechnology                    STOP Wasting Shielding Gas

Home Up Search

MIG Welders Typically Use 4 to 6 Times More Gas Than Needed.  SEE PROOF & WHY

Using CO MIG Shielding Gas? Click to See How to Cut Gas Cost in Half While "GOING GREEN!"

Our Customers Saved Millions of Dollars in MIG Shielding Gas While Improving Weld QualitySEE LIST

 

 

Up TIP of the MONTH Improve Quality Purchase Gas Saver About Company Global Environment Go Green INDUSTRY TOOLS PRODUCT INDEX Payback Estimates Production Results Flow Rate Limiter Training Purchase Weld School WELD SHOP TOOLS Video Overview Sales Literature Other Weld Info More GSS Info Save Gasoline Services Overview Reports Vette Info Car Buffs Specials Contact Us Site Index

 

Gas Waste Documented:

An article in Trailer Body Builders magazine quotes a representative from Praxair, a leading producer and marketer of shielding gases, indicating their findings show the average fabricator using MIG welding consumes 6 times the amount of gas theoretically needed.  Stated as a percentage, 83% of the shielding gas used is wasted! (Reference 1 Below)

Another article in The Fabricator magazine confirmed this finding of up to 6 times the needed shielding gas  being used in fabrication shops. (Reference 2 Below)

We have found similar amounts of gas waste in shops and have quantified three major reasons:

FIRST REASON FOR GAS WASTE: GAS SURGE

The surge of shielding gas occurring at every weld start is a major contributor to the gas waste.  (Note: by disconnecting the wire feed and depressing the torch trigger the high velocity gas surge can easily be heard exiting the torch nozzle.)  Each time the torch switch is pulled, up to 6 times the physical gas hose volume (from gas supply to the wire feeder or welder) is wasted.  In addition to the gas waste this gas surge creates a turbulent  shield that pulls air into the weld zone.  This moisture laden air causes inferior quality weld starts with internal weld porosity and excess weld  start spatter.

THE SOLUTION: The use of our recently patented Gas Saver System (GSS TM ) eliminates this excess gas surge. One fabricator purchased our GSS and tested the amount of gas waste reduction. Their tests were made using shielding gas from cylinders so they could accurately measure usage. They welded 236 identical parts with a full cylinder and their normal gas hose and welder settings.  They installed our GSS replacing their gas delivery hose and with no other changes they welded 632 of the same parts with a full cylinder!  All gas savings were from the reduced gas surge at the weld start.  See Why the Gas Surge Exists and How the GSS  Works.

Have Questions about our Gas Saver System.  Click for some Q&A that may help or

Click to Email.

SECOND CAUSE OF WASTE: EXCESS GAS FLOW SETTINGS

We have often found gas flowmeters with the ball pinned to the top of the flow tube.  Our tests show this can be a 150 Cubic Feet per Hour (CFH) gas flow rate.

This excess is not only wasteful but causes poor weld quality.  The following is a quote from an article published in Practical Welding Today by Kevin Lyttle, Manager Welding R&D for Praxair which states;  “In many instances production site surveys (of fabricators using MIG and Cored Wire) determine that shielding gas flow rates typically are set in excess of 50 CFH.  This can contribute to poor weld quality as atmospheric gases are drawn into the arc zone because of excess gas turbulence.  Optimized flow enhances quality and reduces shielding gas usage.” (Reference 3 Below)

Another article by The Welding Institute in Cambridge England qualified the maximum flow rates in a MIG torch before excess turbulence was created.  For the most common 5/8 inch ID MIG torch nozzle, 48 CFH is the maximum flow rate before turbulence is encountered.  For those using low current MIG welders employing the typical ˝ inch ID MIG torch nozzle (used by most small shops and home users) will allow only a 37 CFH maximum flow before encountering turbulence. (Reference 4 Below)

Research performed to see if increased flow could improve weld quality in a 5 MPH wind environment yielded interesting results.  This unpublished work showed that with a standard 5/8 inch ID MIG torch nozzle, a 45 CFH shielding gas flow rate produced less internal porosity than 65 CFH!  This validates that turbulence created by the 65 CFH flow rate causes moisture laden air to be sucked into the shielding gas stream and is counter productive.  Unfortunately many welders think "if some shielding gas is good more must be better."

We find most folks selling shielding gas either; 1) don’t  understand the excess flow problem or 2) don’t communicate it or that the start gas surge is a key reason for shielding gas waste and weld problems.  Recently when discussing our GSS with an engineer at a plant making highway trailers he said his gas supplier just checked their flow rates and the 100 CFH set by flow control orifices at their pipeline gas drops was fine!  As my 9 year old granddaughter would say, “Like Duh!”

THE SOLUTION: If  you’re using flowmeters on cylinders or on a pipeline gas supply a patent pending lock (photo left) is available that allows the maximum flow rate to be set and locked.  See Details.

THIRD CAUSE OF WASTE: GAS LEAKS We have found leaks are often subjectively viewed as the cause of gas waste when purchasing finds gas use is far more than calculations show should be used (Click to See A Way to Determine How Much Gas You Should Use.)  We have found leaks are often not as significant a cause of waste as initial gas surge and excess flow settings.  However leaks are easy to detect and fix and should not be tolerated.  Another reason to fix leaks is their effect on weld quality.  When gas is leaking out of a pipeline, hose or fitting; moisture laden air is leaking back through the leak!  Click to see our home study training programs that define these situations and how to correct them.

REFERENCES:

  1. Weber, R., How to Save 20% on Welding Costs. Trailer/Body Builders, Volume 44, Number 3, January 2003
  2. Standifer, L. R., Shielding Gas Consumption Efficiency. The Fabricator, Volume 30, Number 6, June 2000.
  3. Lyttle, K. and Stapon, G., Simplifying Shielding Gas Selection. Practical Welding Today, Vol. 9, No. 1, Jan/Feb 2005.
  4. Wilkinson, M. E., Direct Gas Shield Analysis to Determine Shielding Efficiency. Report of The Welding Institute, Cambridge, England, December 1974

 

 

Purchase

Gas Saving

Products  

 

 

Purchase Training

Products

 

Save over $1000 per year per welder and improve weld starts with Payback measured in weeks!!
( * US Patent  # 6,610,957;  "Welding Shielding Gas Saver Device" August 26, 2003,  Patent Pending in other countries)   Other site material presented may be covered under 2006 issued US Patents # 7,015,412 or # 7,019,248 or may be Patent Pending.
Questions?   Send E-mail TechSupport@NetWelding.com
Last modified: 08/15/08

 © 2008 WA Technology, LLC.  All rights reserved.